patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Freedom Valley Y Leaders Say Merger Opponents are Race-Baiting

An e-mail from the Freedom Valley YMCA's management criticizes a flyer sent to members yesterday.

 

Freedom Valley YMCA members received an e-mail from the organization late Wednesday afternoon, November 14, regarding a flyer that was reportedly left at the Phoenixville YMCA's information desk listing seven reasons to vote against the merger with the Philadelphia YMCA

"Not one of the issues addressed in the flyer was factually accurate," the e-mail reads.

YMCA leaders have repeatedly asserted that there is a "lot of misinformation" being disseminated regarding the merger.

[Editor's note: A copy of the e-mail from the YMCA can be read in the PDF section of this article.]

The e-mail goes on, however, to sharply criticize the language in the flyer. 

The e-mail reads, "An example of the type of vitriol that is now being strewn follows – and this is a direct quote from the flyer: 

'Do you think it's possible under the proposed merger for a couple bus loads of inner-city Y members to trek out to OUR Y to enjoy the beautiful pools on a hot summer day? Or overrun our playgrounds? It will be if you allow this merger. So get in line because the crowds are coming. We have great facilities, but they will soon be at risk to over-use, crowding, damage, depreciation, and possibly vandalism.'"

The e-mail continues: "More offensive than the falsehood, however, is the not too subtle racial overtone in the message. The author suggests in the flyer that a merger with Main Line Y would be fine... but not with center city Philly."

The e-mail says that the bigotry displayed in the flyer is "anathema to everything for which the YMCA stands, and should cause any member to take umbrage that this is the type of scare tactic being adopted by some of those opposed to the merger."

"This is what happens when there are no valid arguments to support one's position," the e-mail contends. 

A vote on the merger is scheduled for 7 p.m. Thursday night, Nov. 15, at Chadwick's Restaurant, 2750 Egypt Road in Audubon. According to information presented at a town hall on Monday evening, Freedom Valley YMCA members who wish to vote must attend the meeting. 

Both sides, Freedom Valley and Philadelphia, have to agree on the merger for it to happen. 

Related Topics: Ymca

SKH

7:19 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

I no longer live in the area and don't have enough information to be on a "side". My comment is on the email sent by the Y to members. I only read the excerpt in the article and in the short bite alone I see words such as "umbrage" and "anathema". No organization with a diverse membership should use language above a sixth grade level, to be all inclusive. Your email has "not too subtle" superiority, exclusivity, and condescending overtones. Could this be indicative of the general leadership style, thereby inviting such backlash to the merger?

Reply
Comment_arrow

PHANTOM

9:39 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Exactly my impression! What did they do, go to the Thesaurus or Webster's Dictionary and try to find the least used, most complicated words to try to confound and intimidate the members with their own elitism and intellectual banter?!?!?

Comment_arrow

Amy

11:14 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

You've got to be kidding. Only an imbecile would conclude a tone of "superiorty, exclusivity, and condescending overtones" from the use of a few vocabulary words you don't know. Buy a dictionary.

Comment_arrow

ed r.

1:50 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

The war on intellectualism continues.

Comment_arrow

PHANTOM

4:25 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

If a dictionary is needed to translate an "information intended" email, they are clearly using the wrong vernacular! (do YOU need a translation?)

Peter C. Brown

7:43 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

So what was the vote last night?

Reply

Wendy

8:33 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Honestly....Can anyone say "The Valley Club of Huntingdon Valley" all over again?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ike

12:23 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

And what does that mean Ms. Wendy?

Fred Jennings

8:37 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

It would seem to me that making a profit has changed the original direction of the Y. They charge more for the use of their facilities than a gym. When I was living in Boise Idaho their monthly rate for one adult was $ 42.90 the gym I chose with all the same amenities including a pool was $ 19.00 a month.

Reply

Chris

9:51 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Is it possible that the author's concern of Philly vs. Main Line is membership numbers? Perhaps, just perhaps, they are okay with a smaller organization coming into the fold versus the thousands of individuals that are part of the Philadelphia system? The YMCA should be ashamed for turning this into a racial issue. If you're so concerned about the flyer's scare tactics, perhaps you shouldn't be using them yourselves.

Also, if you don't want people to spew "falsehoods" perhaps you should have been more forthcoming in your communication plan. Telling your membership of a town-hall meeting and a vote with less than a week's notice isn't exactly my definition of "an open book". If you are concerned about all the speculation you need look no further than your own communication plan

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

9:10 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

The Flyer used by an opponent to the merger was left on branch information tables and it used the Y logo to make it appear it was from the Y. While the Y never claimed it was racially biased it was clearly culturally biased and meant to warn people about the problems with people from the "city" ... including theft. There have also been many, many absolute mis-statement of facts in emails, newspapers and verbally. If these comments were just verbal between members that is one thing but when they attempt to distribute obviously false statements with inflammatory remarks on flyers with the Y's logo it was very appropriate for the Y to respond to these tactics.

Bridal Carol

11:23 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

Listen, Both sides have a point. All accusations of "racism" aside ( because there was not any mention of race) I'm sure some people are just concerned. The thought may be that the PVille Y will get more crowded (The pool I think is the main concern) and that it will slip in the comfort level for its current members. That's all. Its a valid concern. I do think people are AFRAID, since it SEEMS like more of a one directional merger- P-Ville folks ain't going to the city, but maybe the city will come to P-ville. We are a diverse community in P-ville, and there are no problems with that, but I guess some folks "imagine" large numbers of "outsiders" descending on the place, and bringing with it a vision of an "open fire hydrant" mentality. But lets remember anyone coming to the P-ville pool would be a MEMBER of the Y (albeit Philly Branch) and maybe that's what opponents are forgetting. Its easy to imagine a "fire hydrant" crowd if you forget this fact. These are our fellow MEMBERS. That being said, the P-Ville members need assurance from management that should the conditions at the Pool or elsewhere decline, or that theft, cursing, roughness, rudeness, or ANYTHING else increases in any way that it will be addressed. Our newcomers also must understand the vibe and culture of the PVille Y is chill, polite, quiet, friendly, peaceful, safe, and a fun place to bring the fam. City can spell rough and I think that's the thing most are afraid of. and THAT has ZERO to do with race...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jaxxon

1:42 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

There are definitely concerns that go beyond any conversation about racism, and to generalize an entire opposition from the comments of a few, however vocal, is a mistake. That said, when you hear the language of "busing inner city kids" (and I am going from what the article, says, because my browser won't lead the actual pdf) to the suburbs, you hear the same specters of the anti-school-integration movement of the 70's being raised all over again, and that movement was largely racist. So, it's not too much of a leap to ask whether this letter (again, not to generalize the entire opposition) has racist overtones given the language.
Finally, if I read the materials from the Y officials themselves on these concerns (available through links posted on a previous patch article on this topic. See for example http://www.fvymca.org/file/any/Common%20Merger%20Q&A102412_2.pdf), the documents said that /local/ members have priority for outdoor pool usage, making this letter misleading: "Usage of outdoor pools (Spring Valley, Phoenixville and Upper Perkiomen Valley Branches) will be limited to current Freedom Valley YMCA Association members."

1

12:16 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

While there was something fishy about the merger (I still can't see how it benefits the Spring Valley Y in any way) the people who argued against it did so for all the wrong reasons. They used a lot of racist "code words" and claimed people on the Y board were making money on the deal. The YMCA is a non-profit 403 B and are monitored pretty closely by the IRS to in order to keep their tax exemption so it is pretty doubtful some board member is sneaking out with a bag of cash. People on both sides need to chill out as I don't think this merger will impact anyone in the short term. If rates increase, programs decline, etc... as a result people will simply vote with their feet and leave. Let's see how this all shakes out before going nuts.

Reply

Chris

12:40 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

They (the YMCA) have stated that there is no reciprocity (apologies in advance for the "superior" word) as it relates to the pool. In my opinion, this is where the YMCA dropped the ball. They should have sent a long communication to all members addressing this and other questions months ago. Instead, they waited until the last minute and said very little, allowing people to "theorize" which always leads to things like this. Simply stated, they dropped the ball and are now paying for it. But at the end of the day, I don't think there will be any real change (positive or negative) to the Freedom Valley Ys.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

9:41 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I am a member of the Freedom Valley Y Board of Directors and I left some comments below to help our members understand the big picture and why we want to merge. While the future changes for existing FVY members may not be evident the primary reason for the merger is to allow us to provide even more scholarships and financial help to the needy families within our current area ... and ... It will allow us to continue to expand and reach out to help communities that are either not served by a great Y facility or they are under-served by a struggling Y.
We are proud of the way we reached out and invested in the construction of Spring Valley without any degradation of service to Phoenixville (in fact we expanded the Phoenixville branch substantially after we built SV). We are proud of the way we are building two more full service facilities at Upper Perk and Audubon. We realize that current members don't benefit much from those new facilities but our mission is not to just serve one community. The financial base we will have will insure that we can continue to provide great services and facilities to our current members AND we will be able to reach out to tens of thousands of others who can benefit from our experience, employees and volunteers. Ironically when we expand to new areas we tap the know-how and experience of members from current branches (volunteers) to help make the new branches a success. It is gratifying when we see current members reaching out to help others.

Deb Johnston

12:41 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Perhaps the dissemination (means giving out) of information regarding the merger might have been done better, I for one understand what this is about. It is a merger to improve the financial operations of the Y, more of a balance sheet issue as opposed to an issue affecting daily operations of the Y. In yesterday's Patch it says, "Lipstein said that there will be no reciprocity for use of the outdoor pools at Freedom Valley's branches, nor will Philadelphia members be allowed to sign up for fitness classes. Freedom Valley members will not be allowed to register for free classes at Philadelphia branches (they will be able to attend paid classes).

The benefits, Lipstein said, include better risk management, more purchasing power for the merged YMCAs in insurance and supply buying, and a larger presence among the national YMCA's policy-making team. "

It is an illustration of the power of numbers so that the combined Y will have more clout in the marketplace when buying things like health insurance for its employees or maintenance equipment that all the facilities need.
Unfortunately it has brought to light that there are some members of the Y who do not get what the Y is all about. Perhaps there are members of the Philly Y that don't want Spring Valley or P-ville members intruding on their facilities!

Reply

Lionel Hutz

12:47 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

The more I learn about the reasons for the merger they make some sense. However the management at the Y did a terrible job communicating the benefits to it's members. I'm no genius when it comes to mergers but I'm pretty sure you want to control the message as best as possible before people start to speculate. I know a number of workers at the P-ville Y who were called racist simply for asking questions and trying to get informed.

From what I've learned there will be no reciprocity of the use of pools (a major concern), the mergered Y's would save over 200K yearly in national fees since they only need to pay one fee instead of two seperate fees, Freedom Valley would have access to more money from the Philadelphia Y. The Philly Y gets much more corporate support/money (IBX, Comcast and such). Freedom Valley would apparently have access to more of that money. The Philly Y would have more freedom to move corporate offices out of the city, saving money in taxes and leases.

If the management had done a better job communicating to its membership the value of the merger and what is and is not involved a lot of ugliness would have been avoided.

On a side note, some of the management at the Y is very strong yet some people in power positions haven't a clue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Judi

12:52 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

It would help if people read their mail!

Comment_arrow

Lionel Hutz

1:14 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Apparently a piece of mail is not sufficient to reach a membership as large as the YMCA's. It should have been advertised at the Y's so people could see it while they were walking in. I'm sure you would have connected with a lot more of the memebership if it were right in front of them. A town hall meeting prior to the week of the vote probably would have helped as well. To simply say "it would help if people read their mail" seems to be out of touch with how people communicate. Like I had stated the Y needed to do a better job of communicating the benefits and control the message. Clearly a piece of mail mixed in with bills and junk mail doesn't get much attention.

Wendy

12:48 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I would suggest everyone attend the Diversity Workshops happening at CAT-Pickering tomorrow at 8:30a. Because as a professional who lived in a diverse community all my life, this merger has serious cultural/legal problems. I have heard more "racial slurs" from an educated community here than ever before.....simply because they think it's ACCEPTABLE.

It's not the kids of the inner city that will be the problem....It will be the adults of the townships that will bring another "The Valley Club of Huntingdon Valley" ending.

The best way to prevention is to have cultural awareness and these workshops is a start. Hope to see everyone TOMORROW AT CAT-PICKERING @ 8:30A.

Reply

Judi

12:49 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

The Y did send communications to the members a while ago. They knew about it and were given links to the information long before the vote. The flyer was out of line. In addition, the Rocky Run Y in Media, which is part of the Philadelphia Y and has beautiful facilities does not get busloads of inner-city youth dumping on them. It's simply not going to happen!
The flyer was inflammatory with no proof to back it up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

12:53 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Simply not true in many cases. I, along with other members I have spoken with, received no prior communication. Sounds like you did so somewhere there was a breakdown. Unfortunate...

Judi

1:17 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

One of several communications I got from the Y...Including not one, but two letters informing me of the merger and the vote that were sent prior to this email. The announcement came a couple of months ago. It was sent out and several following communications. It helps if people take the time to get on the email list and open and read their snail mail.

REMINDER
Stay updated and educated
about the pending merger

The Spring Valley YMCA will host an informational meeting for members who would like to learn more about the pending merger between
Freedom Valley YMCA and Philadelphia YMCA & Vicinity.

November 12, 2012 at 7:00pm

Spring Valley YMCA
19 W. Linfield-Trappe Road, Limerick, PA

CEOs Jay Schaeffer, Freedom Valley YMCA, John Flynn, Philadelphia YMCA & Vicinity and Sandy Lipstein, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Freedom Valley YMCA will be available to address members' questions.

Visit our website to access the following information regarding the proposed merger.

Click here to view...
• Answers to the most commonly asked questions
• A message from the Chairman of the Board
• The type of privileges and limitations you can expect from an approved merger
• Voting details: Where and when do I vote?
• Plan of Merger

The Freedom Valley YMCA

Reply
Comment_arrow

Judi

1:34 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

BTW, this one was sent via email on November 2, 2012, more than two weeks ago.

Hipster Kitty

1:27 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

God forbid mommy and her kids see a couple of "inner city kids." Yes, those people actually exist and are not just images on TV. Sheltered suburban people are as bad as backward cousin-loving country folks. The only difference is suburbanites try to use money to hide the fact that they are racist.

Reply

Paul O'Leary

2:18 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

This merger has been approved by both sides by the vote. It is done.

Reply
Comment_arrow

1

2:24 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Good. Maybe now people will find something else to have fake outrage about....

JM

3:16 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

The YMCA sent out plenty of communication. I received two letters in the mail, at least two emails, and there were tables set up in the lobby of both Phoenixville and Spring Valley. I really can't believe people think that it was not sufficient communication.

Reply

birdfan

5:08 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Im not a member of any Y ever but if I were a member of a small town Y I would not want to merge with any big city Y. Plain and simple. Its like merging two different planets. City life and country life. It doesnt mesh well. You have a good thing, it works why change it.

Reply

Caren Kolter

6:17 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I think a Y membership should give access to every Y.

Reply

Chris

9:40 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Judi, I'll take your word for it that you received communications. I'd appreciate the same faith in my response when I again tell you many others did not.

Reply

the original harry finster1

9:55 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

ha ha ha did you ever wonder why the farther you get from philadelphia the higher the home prices ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

1

10:20 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Try buying a home on Rittenhouse Square or anywhere in Old City or the water front condos....The "Main Line" is also closer to Phllly yet I bet you couldn't afford a 2 bedroom apartment in a place like Radnor. Your assessment of Philly is typical racist garbage most likely coming from a loser who lives in a row home in Phoenixville. ha ha ha

Comment_arrow

Jaxxon

12:15 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

It's called real estate redlining--which lead to the residential segregation (a) that arose in the course of the suburban development after World War II and (b) we live with today. It also happens within the city, but the division between urban and suburban is much more prominent.

Comment_arrow

Jaxxon

12:18 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I forgot to mention: the real estate redlining I mentioned was (and still is) an unquestionably racist practice.

the original harry finster1

1:12 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

if you looked at the big picture philadelphia is a collapsed city that the vibrant and alive people have fled ,that might be said for the whole phila area we have a saying where i live would the last person to leave pennsylvainia please turn out the lights

Reply

Chris

7:19 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Harry you are grossly misinformed. Check the last census. Philadelphia is one again growing in number of residents as well as businesses. Out is actuallyin terrific shape with all the institutions of higher education which draw businesses to talent which in turn draws people. In addition they are investing a substantial amount in airport expansion. The city is growing by leaps and bounds. I'd encourage you to read the 2035 plan as your assessment is factually inaccurate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Judi

12:34 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Chris, you are exactly right in your assessment. There are many professionals moving back into the city. The neighborhoods there are revitalizing, even in such places as South Philly! There are wonderful things to do in the city and young people are flocking there. I know some of them. It has been wonderful to see what this area has done just in the last 15 years, from Philly to Manyunk to Conshohocken to Phoenixville itself.

Comment_arrow

the original harry finster1

3:00 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

once you step off the campus you are in the third world sad comment on your collapsing society

Ike

8:12 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Why would the Y in Philly want to travel here to swim when they have a Y in Philly? Is not that why the Y has local Y s? The Phoenixville wouldnt want to travel to Philly to use the pool when they have one here? Right? Why would the Y want to waste money on gas and bbbbbusing, when Y in all states have local Y s?
I can see say if a member werer visitinig a friend in another town and there was a Y in that town to use , than ,well ok THIER ALLRAEDY THERE , BUT WHY GO OUT OF THE WAY WHEN YOU CAN USE THE ONE IN YOUR HOME TOWN.
I do not know , since a membership cost way too much for my family when they all were young , and i still think it does these days... Can someone tell me how much to say , a summer membership, if they have them . Ok thanks , this just sounds a lttle crazy , to go out of the way to use a Y , if you have one in your home town.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sharon

12:04 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

From what I gathered from a previous article, there are no pools at the Philly Y.

Comment_arrow

Judi

12:24 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Sharon, The Philadelphia Y is made up of several branches, some of which do have pools, even in the inner city. As an aside, I am not sure if anyone here is aware of the fact that neighborhood pools also exist in Philadelphia that are outdoor pools.

Comment_arrow

Judi

12:29 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Hi Ike, to answer your question, yes, the Y still costs quite a bit, but I think it's worth it. Also, you can no longer get just a summer membership at Phoenixville. They did away with that many years ago. Another thing is that No one is going to go all the way to Phoenixville or Spring City when there are plenty of branches within the Philadelphia Y (like Rocky run in Media) where there are pools, so much closer to Philly. Then again, they don't see big influxes of people invading.

Hipster Kitty

8:29 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

You people understand that if people from the city get in the pool, you won't get contaminated from getting in the water too. It's not the 1950s anymore.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ike

9:01 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Why would you even say that? My thinking is that if you have a local Y why would you want to travel 46 mins to an hr. to swim? Its like going to Philly to buy something at Wegams , when there is one in Oaks.
I must be missing something here.

Tom

8:36 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I am a member of the Freedom Valley Board and I was one of three board members who worked on the merger committee that met with our counterparts at the Philly Y. The important reasons for the merger have been distributed in many ways but they are apparently hard for some members to accept.
1.- The combination of the two Y's will make us among a handful of the most financially stable Y's in the country and will help to insure that we will be able to maintain the great facilities and service indefinitely
2- The merger will allow us to raise many more charitable contributions from large corporations and others who are in our expanded geographic area. We will be able to provide OVER 2 million dollars in scholarships to needy families in our existing branch areas.
3- The merger will provide more job opportunities for our employees and it will allow us to attract top notch employees because of the "scale" of our organization. The key to providing great service to our members lies with our ability to attract and retain great employees.
4- The merger will allow the Freedom Valley Y to take advantage of "pilot" programs (like diabetes prevention) where substantial funding is provided to only large organizations. We will now be able to obtain funding for many pilot programs that we can not take advantage of now.
There are more advantages but these are the primary issues that drove our merger decisions

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom

8:39 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I want to add some additional comments to help members understand as many issues as possible. Again ... this is coming from a board member of the Freedom Valley Y.
There has been many false statements made about the motivation of the top management of the Y.
Unlike board members of "for-profit" companies the board members of the Y have nothing financially to gain from the decisions they make. Most board members are members of the Y ... they use the Y ... their families use the Y. We want the best for the Y because we want great service and great facilities for ourselves and our families.
More importantly we also are committed to the mission of the Y. We want to help needy families who can't afford what we have to offer. We are currently building two more major facilities in Upper Perk and the Audubon/Norristown area that will enable us to provide services to many, many more people. The merger with Philly will allow us to continue this expansion in the future and it will and allow us to reach out to even more areas that are not served by a YMCA ... WITHOUT negatively impacting what we have now. About 90% of the issues addressed in the Town Hall meeting had to do with protecting what members have now and little to do with the big picture and the future health of the Y

Randy Morin

8:41 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I am a Y member and my main concern about the merger is that our prices will go up. Most of of the Y branches in the Philly Y have higher membership dues than the Freedom Valley Y (roughly $10-15 per month).

My other concern is that good programs may be dropped and/or changed. When the merger with Limerick occurred there were some programs (e.g., tween night) that my kids always enjoyed that disappeared. Of course this can work both ways so perhaps new programs may be added.

Reply

Chris

3:11 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Thanks Tom. I think most of the issue was around communication. While it sounds like some members were notifed well in advance, others (myself included) received nothing. Another great eample was this weeks letter dispelling some of the myths. We have a family membership with 5 of us. We received one letter addressed to my 6 year old. Odd right? I think the merger is fairly benign from an impact to the members standpoint. Hopefully people will understand this.

Reply

Leave a comment